spqrblues: (boom)
(A rant, not related to Rome at all. You can skip it.)

It's taken a long time, but I'm finally hearing, from more and more quarters, exasperation at the sheer bewildering wrongness of the near-constant insistence in the publishing industry that "we need more boy books"—a mantra I've been hearing since Day One of entering the publishing field. (Never mind for now what a "boy book" actually is—you can refer to the section in the Chicago Manual style guide on removing girl cooties.) A few days ago, YA author Tamora Pierce questioned this Truth in her journal, in which, along with much other spirited commentary on a variety of sub- and related topics, she states:

In the last couple of years, there has been a lot of stuff about how we don't have enough books out there for boys.

The last couple of years? Try the last couple of decades.

Read the rest, in which I ramble semi-coherently )

I'd quote what YA editor Sharyn November has to say about the perpetual "we need more books for boys" wail, but this is a family journal. I only allow naked body parts, not cussing. Oh, wait, I allow cussing, too. Okay, never mind.

 

"There's nothing I enjoy as much as a jolly catastrophe"
—J. G. Ballard

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
345678 9
101112131415 16
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, 17 October 2017 09:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios