I blame the tools
A minor rant on packaging of supplies for comics artists, with boobs.
This is the old packaging for the illustration board I usually use to draw the comic.
Simple, professional, and you don't have to feel goofy when you buy it, because you are totally a serious artist, and stuff.
And this is the boobified new packaging.
While I understand the marketing reasoning for going with the gigantic eyes and the water-balloon boobs, I'd never pick this up in a comic store, an art-supplies store, or from a convention table. But, of course, I'm not the demographic they're marketing to.
It's not a cheap product (though it looks cheap, nowooh, see how I used the two connotations of the wordburn). I'd think if you need the more expensive stuff (it holds up pretty well to eraser abuse), you wouldn't need boobages to attract you to the product, you'd simply buy what you need. But maybe they'd like to get artists who don't consider themselves professional level to upgrade to the heavier stuff; one-ply Bristol Board being a gateway drug, and all. In fact, I don't know why they don't just indicate the ply of the paper by the size of the cup.
Good thing there's mail order. I guess.

Simple, professional, and you don't have to feel goofy when you buy it, because you are totally a serious artist, and stuff.

While I understand the marketing reasoning for going with the gigantic eyes and the water-balloon boobs, I'd never pick this up in a comic store, an art-supplies store, or from a convention table. But, of course, I'm not the demographic they're marketing to.
It's not a cheap product (though it looks cheap, nowooh, see how I used the two connotations of the wordburn). I'd think if you need the more expensive stuff (it holds up pretty well to eraser abuse), you wouldn't need boobages to attract you to the product, you'd simply buy what you need. But maybe they'd like to get artists who don't consider themselves professional level to upgrade to the heavier stuff; one-ply Bristol Board being a gateway drug, and all. In fact, I don't know why they don't just indicate the ply of the paper by the size of the cup.
Good thing there's mail order. I guess.
Re: [rant!]
(Anonymous) 2007-10-14 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)Then again, a scantily-clad, wasp waisted Sacajawea, with milk-distended boobs (like the cover-girl on Heinlein's "Friday" (not to initiate another rant) would definitely have some adolescent appeal. I, on the other hand, would pass such a cover by with a sneer... after taking a good, long look so that I might despise the obvious pandering to an appropriate degree.
DRW, stalwartly un-amused by sexist pandering... after all, I could imagine a much more appealing babe, with substantially smaller boobs and her own sword.
Re: [rant!]
Re: [rant!]
(Anonymous) 2007-10-15 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)